[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120423142935.GC19734@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:29:36 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where
possible
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:23:27AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:17:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> >
> > Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol.
> >
> > This is safe since it will always run from a process context.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> requirements?
Sorry about that, I would like to withdraw this change from
consideration for stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists