netdev - [BUG report] net.core.rmem_default is larger than net.core.rmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F9A676A.8070406@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:31:22 +0800
From:	Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG report] net.core.rmem_default is larger than net.core.rmem_max


It's unconventional that "default" value  is greater than "max". :-(

net.core.rmem_max = 131071
net.core.rmem_default = 229376

net.core.wmem_max = 131071
net.core.wmem_default = 229376


And bisect the code to find the following commit caused this phenomenon.
This patch increase SK_WMEM_MAX and SK_RMEM_MAX which are used to 
initialize them.
But rmem_max and wmem_max value are still be covered according the RAM size
in sk_init().

87fb4b7b533073eeeaed0b6bf7c2328995f6c075 is the first bad commit
commit 87fb4b7b533073eeeaed0b6bf7c2328995f6c075
Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 13 07:28:54 2011 +0000

    net: more accurate skb truesize


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html