netdev - Re: [BUG report] net.core.rmem_default is larger than net.core.rmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD5528B.7020301@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:06:03 +0800
From:	Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG report] net.core.rmem_default is larger than net.core.rmem_max


Shan Wei said, at 2012/4/27 17:31:

> 
> It's unconventional that "default" value  is greater than "max". :-(
> 
> net.core.rmem_max = 131071
> net.core.rmem_default = 229376


ping......

I have no idea to fix this. 
Maybe add rmem_max value to be greater than rmem_default?
Eric, can you look into this?


> 
> net.core.wmem_max = 131071
> net.core.wmem_default = 229376
> 
> 
> And bisect the code to find the following commit caused this phenomenon.
> This patch increase SK_WMEM_MAX and SK_RMEM_MAX which are used to 
> initialize them.
> But rmem_max and wmem_max value are still be covered according the RAM size
> in sk_init().
> 
> 87fb4b7b533073eeeaed0b6bf7c2328995f6c075 is the first bad commit
> commit 87fb4b7b533073eeeaed0b6bf7c2328995f6c075
> Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date:   Thu Oct 13 07:28:54 2011 +0000
> 
>     net: more accurate skb truesize
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html