netdev - Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL support for e1000e)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	e1000-devel list <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL
 support for e1000e)

On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> Thanks John for pointers to those.  Ben, are you running a kernel with
>> these patches?
>
> I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine.  With these patches,
> I can no longer reproduce the problem.
>
> So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable!

Dave:  I think these patches below should go to 3.3 stable.

They are not queued for stable yet as far as I can tell.

Thanks,
Ben

>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>>
>>> Tom, did you see these two patches? Maybe this is resolved by
>>> the second patch.
>>>
>>> We needed these to fixup ixgbe and igb (i didn't test e1000e)
>>> looks like we might want to push these at stable. I don't
>>> believe they are in 3.3.
>>>
>>> commit b37c0fbe3f6dfba1f8ad2aed47fb40578a254635
>>> Author: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>>> Date:   Tue Feb 7 02:29:06 2012 +0000
>>>
>>>      net: Add memory barriers to prevent possible race in byte queue limits
>>>
>>>      This change adds a memory barrier to the byte queue limit code to address a
>>>      possible race as has been seen in the past with the
>>>      netif_stop_queue/netif_wake_queue logic.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>>>      Tested-by: Stephen Ko<stephen.s.ko@...el.com>
>>>      Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b37c0fbe3f6dfba1f8ad2aed47fb40578a254635
>>>
>>>
>>> commit 5c4903549c05bbb373479e0ce2992573c120654a
>>> Author: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>>> Date:   Tue Feb 7 02:29:01 2012 +0000
>>>
>>>      net: Fix issue with netdev_tx_reset_queue not resetting queue from XOFF state
>>>
>>>      We are seeing dev_watchdog hangs on several drivers.  I suspect this is due
>>>      to the __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF bit being set prior to a reset for link
>>>      change, and then not being cleared by netdev_tx_reset_queue.  This change
>>>      corrects that.
>>>
>>>      In addition we were seeing dev_watchdog hangs on igb after running the
>>>      ethtool tests.  We found this to be due to the fact that the ethtool test
>>>      runs the same logic as ndo_start_xmit, but we were never clearing the XOFF
>>>      flag since the loopback test in ethtool does not do byte queue accounting.
>>>
>>>      Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
>>>      Tested-by: Stephen Ko<stephen.s.ko@...el.com>
>>>      Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5c4903549c05bbb373479e0ce2992573c120654a
>>>
>>>
>
>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html