netdev - Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to BQL support for e1000e)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120501.174914.654247970871851432.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 01 May 2012 17:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greearb@...delatech.com
Cc:	therbert@...gle.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e tx queue timeout in 3.3.0 (bisected to
 BQL support for e1000e)

From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700

> On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> Thanks John for pointers to those.  Ben, are you running a kernel with
>>> these patches?
>>
>> I just tested this on my e1000e and igb machine.  With these patches,
>> I can no longer reproduce the problem.
>>
>> So, please make sure those are queued up for 3.3 stable!
> 
> Dave:  I think these patches below should go to 3.3 stable.
> 
> They are not queued for stable yet as far as I can tell.

I let the Intel developers handle -stable submissions for their
drivers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html