Message-ID: <4FA06A94.8050704@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 May 2012 15:58:28 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2 net-next] net: make GRO aware of skb->head_frag

On 05/01/2012 10:04 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 09:17 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 22:33 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>
>>>> The question I had was more specific to GRO.  As long as we have
>>>> skb->users == 1 and the skb isn't cloned we should be fine.   It just
>>>> hadn't occurred to me before that napi_gro_receive had the extra
>>>> requirement that the skb couldn't be cloned.
>>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> By the way, even if skb was cloned, we would be allowed to steal
>>> skb->head.
>>>
>>> When we clone an oskb we :
>>>
>>> 1) allocate a struct nskb sk_buff (or use the shadow in case of TCP)
>>> 2) increment dataref
>> The problem I have is with this piece right here.  So you increment
>> dataref.  Now you have an skb that is still pointing to the shared info
>> on this page and dataref is 2.  What about the side that is stealing the
>> head?  Is it going to be tracking the dataref as well and decrementing
>> it before put_page or does it just assume that dataref is 1 and call
>> put_page directly?  I am guessing the latter since I didn't see anything
>> that allowed for tracking the dataref of stolen heads.
> The only changed thing is the kfree() replaced by put_page()
>
> This kfree() was done when last reference to dataref was released.
>
> If we had a problem before, we have same problem after my patch.
>
> Truth is : In TCP (coalesce and splice()) and GRO, we owns skbs.
>
> (See the various __kfree_skb(skb) calls in net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> There is one exception in ipv6 / treq->pktopts ) but its for SYN packet
> and this wont be merged with a previous packet.
Eric,

I think I have found a bug, although it is not specific to this patch
but it is related.  It looks like the TCP coalesce code is causing
tcpdump to fail when using frags.  Based on the comments in the patch I
am assuming you have an ixgbe adapter to test with as that is what I
reproduced this on.  To reproduce the issue all you need to do is run
"tcpdump -i ethX > /dev/null" on one console, and on a second console
run a netperf TCP_MAERTS test to some other server.  Tcpdump will exit
out with a message about bad address like this:

tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
tcpdump: pcap_loop: recvfrom: Bad address
682 packets captured
2357 packets received by filter
1543 packets dropped by kernel


A bisect of the issue tracked it down to:

1402d366019fedaa2b024f2bac06b7cc9a8782e1 is first bad commit
commit 1402d366019fedaa2b024f2bac06b7cc9a8782e1
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 23 07:11:42 2012 +0000

    tcp: introduce tcp_try_coalesce
    
    commit c8628155ece3 (tcp: reduce out_of_order memory use) took care of
    coalescing tcp segments provided by legacy devices (linear skbs)
    
    We extend this idea to fragged skbs, as their truesize can be heavy.
    
    ixgbe for example uses 256+1024+PAGE_SIZE/2 = 3328 bytes per segment.
    
    Use this coalescing strategy for receive queue too.
    
    This contributes to reduce number of tcp collapses, at minimal cost, and
    reduces memory overhead and packets drops.
    
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
    Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
    Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
    Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
    Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
    Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

:040000 040000 8ca3e0b4e6c6a8f375fd800069d24203880623f3 2576d34c5c9cfc717a11e2ebe054143956716b93 M	net

I suspect we are dealing with either a shared or cloned skb in this
case, though I haven't verified which it is yet.

Thanks,

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists