netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] RPS: Sparse connection optimizations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1336117669.3752.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2012 09:47:49 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
Cc:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RPS: Sparse connection optimizations - v2

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:25 +0800, Deng-Cheng Zhu wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 11:22 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> +struct cpu_flow {
> >> +       struct net_device *dev;
> >> +       u32 rxhash;
> >> +       unsigned long ts;
> >> +};
> >
> > This seems like overkill, we already have the rps_flow_table and this
> > used in accelerated RFS so the device can also take advantage of
> > steering.
> 
> I think the mechanisms of rps_dev_flow_table and cpu_flow (in this
> patch) are different: The former works along with rps_sock_flow_table
> whose CPU info is based on recvmsg by the application. But for the tests
> like what I did, there's no application involved.
> 
> 
> Deng-Cheng

I really suggest you speak with MIPS arch maintainers about these IRQ
being all serviced by CPU0.

Adding tweaks in network stack to lower the impact of this huge problem
is a no go.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html