[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA35A3D.8000205@mips.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:25:33 +0800
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RPS: Sparse connection optimizations - v2
On 05/04/2012 11:22 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> +struct cpu_flow {
>> + struct net_device *dev;
>> + u32 rxhash;
>> + unsigned long ts;
>> +};
>
> This seems like overkill, we already have the rps_flow_table and this
> used in accelerated RFS so the device can also take advantage of
> steering.
I think the mechanisms of rps_dev_flow_table and cpu_flow (in this
patch) are different: The former works along with rps_sock_flow_table
whose CPU info is based on recvmsg by the application. But for the tests
like what I did, there's no application involved.
Deng-Cheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists