lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1336164546.3752.460.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 22:49:06 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Perry Lorier <perryl@...gle.com>, Matt Mathis <mattmathis@...gle.com>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@...gle.com>, Dave Täht <dave.taht@...ferbloat.net>, Ankur Jain <jankur@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: be more strict before accepting ECN negociation On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:36 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > On 05/04/2012 01:20 PM, Rick Jones wrote: > > True, I'm looking at more than the ECN bits, but in the 90 minutes the > > tcpdump has been running there have been no packets with the any of the > > 8 bits at ip[1] being 1 anyway :) Netperf.org doesn't get a massive > > quantity of traffic. It may go the entire week-end or longer without > > seeing such a packet. > > I see fate is working as intended, or someone decided to try to feed me > my words :) for within 6 minutes of my sending the above I got: > > 13:26:16.866007 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 28850, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55363 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x4cfc (correct), seq 304457158, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale > 3,nop,nop,TS val 288116308 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:17.831880 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 6911, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55367 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x17aa (correct), seq 586073737, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale > 3,nop,nop,TS val 288117270 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:17.831929 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 28924, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55368 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x07cc (correct), seq 1513398047, win 65535, options [mss > 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 288117271 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:17.831952 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 2494, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55366 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x75f4 (correct), seq 1153058420, win 65535, options [mss > 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 288117270 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:17.832177 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 6854, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55365 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0xfca0 (correct), seq 2332522875, win 65535, options [mss > 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 288117270 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:17.832239 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 64733, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55364 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x7414 (correct), seq 1544827132, win 65535, options [mss > 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 288117270 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:38.649126 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 9860, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55369 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x6270 (correct), seq 683091230, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale > 3,nop,nop,TS val 288137968 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > 13:26:39.417589 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 13478, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto TCP (6), length 64) > somesystemin.de.55370 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum > 0x2862 (correct), seq 3168323595, win 65535, options [mss > 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 288138734 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 > > rick Interesting indeed ;) Did you check if it was spoofed ? (did the 3WHS really completed) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists