[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA443B6.9010106@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:01:42 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Perry Lorier <perryl@...gle.com>,
Matt Mathis <mattmathis@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@...gle.com>,
Dave Täht <dave.taht@...ferbloat.net>,
Ankur Jain <jankur@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: be more strict before accepting ECN negociation
>
> Interesting indeed ;)
>
> Did you check if it was spoofed ?
>
> (did the 3WHS really completed)
Well, the tcpdump command was still:
tcpdump -i eth0 -vvv '(tcp[tcpflags]& tcp-syn != 0)&& (ip[1] != 0x0)'
I didn't see any SYN|ACKs go out, but netperf.org would have had to set
ECT for me to see a SYN|ACK going out. FWIW, this is on a 2.6.31-15
(Ubuntu) kernel with net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 2 and I don't think the SYNs
themselves were negotiating ECN:
13:26:16.866007 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 41, id 28850, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 64)
somesystemin.de.55363 > www.netperf.org.www: Flags [S], cksum
0x4cfc (correct), seq 304457158, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists