[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514143635.GA12992@1984>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:36:35 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: ipset: fix timeout value overflow bug
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_timeout.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_timeout.h
> > @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ ip_set_timeout_uget(struct nlattr *tb)
> > {
> > unsigned int timeout = ip_set_get_h32(tb);
> >
> > + /* Normalize to fit into jiffies */
> > + if (timeout > UINT_MAX/1000)
> > + timeout = UINT_MAX/1000;
> > +
>
> Doesn't that rather assume that HZ is 1000 ?
Indeed. I overlooked that. Thanks David.
New patch attached fixing this. I've rebased my tree.
@Jozsef: BTW, why do we have
include/linux/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_timeout.h
living under include/linux ?
All definitions are private to the kernel. Why not moving that header
(and other similar) to include/net ?
View attachment "0001-netfilter-ipset-fix-timeout-value-overflow-bug.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (2646 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists