netdev - Re: tcp wifi upload performance and lots of ACKs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FCD15E7.4080700@candelatech.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:09:11 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tcp wifi upload performance and lots of ACKs

On 06/04/2012 12:22 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>  wrote:
>> I'm going some TCP performance testing on wifi ->  LAN interface connections.
>>   With
>> UDP, we can get around 250Mbps of payload throughput.  With TCP, max is
>> about 80Mbps.
>>
>> I think the problem is that there are way too many ACK packets, and
>> bi-directional
>> traffic on wifi interfaces really slows things down.  (About 7000 pkts per
>> second in
>> upload direction, 2000 pps download.  And the vast majority of the download
>> pkts
>> are 66 byte ACK pkts from what I can tell.)
>>
>> Kernel is 3.3.7+
>>
>> Anyone know of any tuning parameters that would let the receiving socket
>> wait a
>> bit longer and send more ACK data in fewer packets?
>
> An ACK is generated after every second full sized segment or a timeout
> expires.
>
> Currently, there is no way to tune these parameters. Here is an experimental
> patch [1]. If anyone, thinks that this patch has a chance to get accepted
> I will be happily try to further improve it.

It looks like it could be useful for my case, but I would also want
per-socket options to set the min/max ack delay so that the settings
are not just system-wide.

I can at least test this, and perhaps even hack on the code if
you are not interested in the per-socket settings...

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html