[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCD16A4.9070705@candelatech.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:12:20 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tcp wifi upload performance and lots of ACKs
On 06/04/2012 12:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 11:29 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>> I'm going some TCP performance testing on wifi -> LAN interface connections. With
>> UDP, we can get around 250Mbps of payload throughput. With TCP, max is about 80Mbps.
>>
>> I think the problem is that there are way too many ACK packets, and bi-directional
>> traffic on wifi interfaces really slows things down. (About 7000 pkts per second in
>> upload direction, 2000 pps download. And the vast majority of the download pkts
>> are 66 byte ACK pkts from what I can tell.)
>>
>> Kernel is 3.3.7+
>>
>> Anyone know of any tuning parameters that would let the receiving socket wait a
>> bit longer and send more ACK data in fewer packets?
>
> Well, thats half duplex days...
WiFi is still half-duplex, and isn't changing any time soon I think.
> There is the ACK every 2 packets rule of thumb, so that tcp sender can
> increase its cwnd.
>
> Then, some folks tried submitting patches to make '2' more like 10 or
> 15, but this went nowhere.
>
> Other idea is to arm a timer and defer ACK sending, in the hope we
> receive another packet very soon.
From a quick read of Daniel's patch..it seems there is already a
timer that could be used for this?
> That could be done with a special qdisc, sort of netem...
That sounds like a horrible hack :)
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists