[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120607.144301.1259354794384347085.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gaofeng@...fujitsu.com
Cc: serge.hallyn@...onical.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for
inetpeer
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
> So I'm dropping these two patches and will work on the mentioned
> approach to this fix.
It turns out that even if I move the inetpeer roots into the FIB rules
layer, we still need your changes Gao.
But your patches are corrupted. For example, in this patch,
the final hunk for net/ipv4/inetpeer.c has no differences only
context. That's an extremely corrupted patch.
Please resolve this, and add the NULL pointer settings during network
namespace shutdown that Eric Dumazet asked for.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists