netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD158E4.1080701@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:44:04 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

于 2012年06月08日 05:43, David Miller 写道:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
> 
>> So I'm dropping these two patches and will work on the mentioned
>> approach to this fix.
> 
> It turns out that even if I move the inetpeer roots into the FIB rules
> layer, we still need your changes Gao.
> 
> But your patches are corrupted.  For example, in this patch,
> the final hunk for net/ipv4/inetpeer.c has no differences only
> context.  That's an extremely corrupted patch.

Sorry for my pool english, I don't understand this.
Can you explain it for me?

> 
> Please resolve this, and add the NULL pointer settings during network
> namespace shutdown that Eric Dumazet asked for.

OK, I will do it.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html