netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120607.205348.913373847915721607.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gaofeng@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for
 inetpeer

From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:44:04 +0800

> Sorry for my pool english, I don't understand this.
> Can you explain it for me?

Look at the end of the parts of the patch that change
net/ipv4/inetpeer.c:

@@ -586,3 +617,3 @@  out:
 	write_sequnlock_bh(&base->lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inetpeer_invalidate_tree);

That makes no sense, it's a patch hunk with no "+" or "-"
lines.

Your patch was corrupted by something.

This is extremely irritating.  I would recommend that you email
patches to yourself, and try to apply the copies you receive
in those emails.  Because that's what the people trying to use
your patch are going to do.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html