netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:27:18 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

于 2012年06月08日 11:53, David Miller 写道:
> From: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:44:04 +0800
> 
>> Sorry for my pool english, I don't understand this.
>> Can you explain it for me?
> 
> Look at the end of the parts of the patch that change
> net/ipv4/inetpeer.c:
> 
> @@ -586,3 +617,3 @@  out:
>  	write_sequnlock_bh(&base->lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(inetpeer_invalidate_tree);
> 
> That makes no sense, it's a patch hunk with no "+" or "-"
> lines.


Thanks David,got it.

> 
> Your patch was corrupted by something.
> 
> This is extremely irritating.  I would recommend that you email
> patches to yourself, and try to apply the copies you receive
> in those emails.  Because that's what the people trying to use
> your patch are going to do.
> 

Sorry, I will try it myself next time. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html