[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD70DD9.4010009@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:37:29 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
CC: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] can: c_can: precedence error in c_can_chip_config()
On 06/11/2012 07:42 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 10.06.2012 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>
>> On 06/09/2012 05:56 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> (CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK) is (0x02 & 0x01) which
>>> is zero so the condition is never true. The intent here was to test
>>> that both flags were set.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> This is a static checker fix. I'm not super familiar with the c_can
>>> code.
>>
>> Good catch. Applied to can-next.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>
>
> Shouldn't this fix go through the net-tree and stable instead of net-next?
Can I add your Acked-by ... when adding to net?
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists