netdev - Re: [patch] can: c_can: precedence error in c_can_chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD7217F.4050404@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:01:19 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@...com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] can: c_can: precedence error in c_can_chip_config()

On 12.06.2012 11:37, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

> On 06/11/2012 07:42 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> On 10.06.2012 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/09/2012 05:56 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>>> (CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK) is (0x02 & 0x01) which
>>>> is zero so the condition is never true.  The intent here was to test
>>>> that both flags were set.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> This is a static checker fix.  I'm not super familiar with the c_can
>>>> code.
>>>
>>> Good catch. Applied to can-next.
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>
>>
>> Shouldn't this fix go through the net-tree and stable instead of net-next?
> 
> Can I add your Acked-by ... when adding to net?


Yes you can :-)

Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html