lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:27:47 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <>
To:	Eric Dumazet <>
Cc:	Li Yu <>, Changli Gao <>,
	Linux Netdev List <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce to batch variants of accept() and epoll_ctl() syscall

Eric Dumazet <> writes:
> I believe accept() is the problem here, because it contends with the
> softirq processing the tcp session handshake.

The MOSBENCH people some time ago did a per CPU accept queue. This is
probably overkill, but there are clearly some scaling problems here
with enough cores.


-- -- Speaking for myself only
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists