[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5D6C0ABE6A236946864C45679362BBE20AC5227D@CMEXMB1.ad.emulex.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:42:31 +0000
From: <Parav.Pandit@...lex.Com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: added support for 40GbE link.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:05 PM
> To: Pandit, Parav
> Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: added support for 40GbE link.
>
> From: <Parav.Pandit@...lex.Com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:33:12 +0000
>
> > Should eventually all net driver should remove using SPEED_xxxxxx and
> start using hard coded value of 10, 100, 1000, 20000?
>
> No, the ones that exist can stay, just no new ones.
>
So driver which supports 40Gpbs, 100Gbps should hardcode to 40000, 100000 respectively?
> > That means ethtool_cmd_speed() should not be called in this function?
>
> Ben said that it must be called, what are you talking about?
Sorry, I wanted to ask - Do you need switch case for speed like below new code or its should be speed independent code?
switch (ethtool_cmd_speed()) {
case SPEED_100:
case SPEED_10:
return DEFAULT_PRB_RETIRE_TOV;
default:
msec = 1;
div = ethtool_cmd_speed() / 1000;
break;
/*
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists