[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340208104.4604.1247.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:01:44 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jbrouer@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, wfg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 1/2] team: use rcu_access_pointer to access
RCU pointer by writer
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:32 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/team/team_mode_activebackup.c | 7 +++++--
> drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c | 8 +++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_activebackup.c b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_activebackup.c
> index 2fe02a8..c9e7621 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_activebackup.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_activebackup.c
> @@ -61,8 +61,11 @@ static void ab_port_leave(struct team *team, struct team_port *port)
>
> static int ab_active_port_get(struct team *team, struct team_gsetter_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - if (ab_priv(team)->active_port)
> - ctx->data.u32_val = ab_priv(team)->active_port->dev->ifindex;
> + struct team_port *active_port;
> +
> + active_port = rcu_access_pointer(ab_priv(team)->active_port);
This is not the correct fix.
You cant safely dereference active_port if you got it from
rcu_access_pointer()
You should use rcu_dereference() of rcu_dereference_protected() or
rcu_dereference_bh() or similar variant, depending on the context.
> + if (active_port)
> + ctx->data.u32_val = active_port->dev->ifindex;
> else
> ctx->data.u32_val = 0;
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
> index 45cc095..b4475a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void lb_tx_hash_to_port_mapping_null_port(struct team *team,
> struct lb_port_mapping *pm;
>
> pm = &lb_priv->ex->tx_hash_to_port_mapping[i];
> - if (pm->port == port) {
> + if (rcu_access_pointer(pm->port) == port) {
This one is OK
> rcu_assign_pointer(pm->port, NULL);
I dont understand why you submit two patches...
> team_option_inst_set_change(pm->opt_inst_info);
> changed = true;
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int lb_bpf_func_set(struct team *team, struct team_gsetter_ctx *ctx)
> if (lb_priv->ex->orig_fprog) {
> /* Clear old filter data */
> __fprog_destroy(lb_priv->ex->orig_fprog);
> - sk_unattached_filter_destroy(lb_priv->fp);
> + sk_unattached_filter_destroy(rcu_access_pointer(lb_priv->fp));
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists