[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120620.140121.1603737472432326278.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux.
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:40:04 +0200
> If someone wants to tune its linux router, he probably already disables
> GRO because of various issues with too big packets.
>
> GRO adds a significant cost to forwarding path.
No, Ben is right Eric. GRO decreases the costs, because it means we
only need to make one forwarding/netfilter/classification decision for
N packets instead of 1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists