[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620140454.36847c65@s6510.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:04:54 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Early TCP socket demux.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:40:04 +0200
>
> > If someone wants to tune its linux router, he probably already disables
> > GRO because of various issues with too big packets.
> >
> > GRO adds a significant cost to forwarding path.
>
> No, Ben is right Eric. GRO decreases the costs, because it means we
> only need to make one forwarding/netfilter/classification decision for
> N packets instead of 1.
GRO is also important for routers that interact with VM's.
It helps reduce the per-packet wakeup of the guest VM's.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists