[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120625.154340.158890441165257041.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: subramanian.vijay@...il.com, dave.taht@...il.com,
hans.schillstrom@...csson.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ncardwell@...gle.com, therbert@...gle.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:42:42 +0200
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 00:34 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>
>> This patch ([PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK
>> packets) is neither in net/net-next trees nor on patchwork. Maybe it
>> was missed since it was sent during the merge window. Is this not
>> needed anymore or is it being tested currently?
>
> You're right, thanks for the reminder !
>
> [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets
I don't agree with this change.
What is the point in having real classification configuration if
arbitrary places in the network stack are going to override SKB
priority with a fixed priority setting?
I bet the person who set listening socket priority really meant it and
does not expect you to override it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists