[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340735032.2486.35.camel@lb-tlvb-eilong.il.broadcom.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:23:52 +0300
From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To: "Alexander Duyck" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
cc: "Yuval Mintz" <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next (v2) 12/14] ixgbe: set maximal number of
default RSS queues
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 08:55 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> One thing that just occurred to me though is that this is going to lock
> the upper limit for us and we won't be able to override it if we
> implement the set channels code. I believe the same thing goes for the
> igb driver as well.
>
> Is there any chance you could just bypass the ixgbe and igb drivers for
> now and give us time to come up with a more complete solution that would
> allow us to add the set_channels calls. One issue is I have a number of
> ixgbe patches that are going to be completely rewriting this code anyway
> so I could probably just add set_channels support and support for your
> function once it is included in net-next.
Alex,
I share your concern. I actually brought it up originally when
discussing this RFC:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=133991625809201&w=2
>>From my end, if you would like to add the Intel side support that would
be great. Unless anyone object, we will leave the ixgbe and igb out of
this patch series.
Thanks,
Eilon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists