[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341225841.5269.69.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:44:01 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rtcache remove respin
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 05:02 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> It's been a while and there were of course a lot of merge hassles with
> the most recent set I posted, so I respun these patches tonight
> because I wanted to see the effects of the recent rpfilter hacks on an
> rtcache-less system.
>
> On a SPARC T3-1:
>
> 1) Output route lookup: ~2800 cycles
> 2) Input route lookups: ~3000 cycles (rpfilter=0)
> ~4300 cycles (rpfilter=1)
>
> Another nice part is how small struct rtable is after this patch set:
>
> struct rtable {
> struct dst_entry dst;
> int rt_genid;
> unsigned int rt_flags;
> __u16 rt_type;
> __be32 rt_dst;
> int rt_route_iif;
> int rt_iif;
> int rt_oif;
> __be32 rt_gateway;
> u32 rt_peer_genid;
> unsigned long _peer;
> struct fib_info *fi;
> };
>
> which is about 208 bytes on sparc64.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Can be <= 192 actually
rcu_head not needed anymore in dst_entry
If we still want __refcnt being on cache line boundary, we might find a
better way to accomplish this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists