[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120702.035917.541700718895213946.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 03:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rtcache remove respin
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:44:01 +0200
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 05:02 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> It's been a while and there were of course a lot of merge hassles with
>> the most recent set I posted, so I respun these patches tonight
>> because I wanted to see the effects of the recent rpfilter hacks on an
>> rtcache-less system.
>>
>> On a SPARC T3-1:
>>
>> 1) Output route lookup: ~2800 cycles
>> 2) Input route lookups: ~3000 cycles (rpfilter=0)
>> ~4300 cycles (rpfilter=1)
>>
>> Another nice part is how small struct rtable is after this patch set:
>>
>> struct rtable {
>> struct dst_entry dst;
>> int rt_genid;
>> unsigned int rt_flags;
>> __u16 rt_type;
>> __be32 rt_dst;
>> int rt_route_iif;
>> int rt_iif;
>> int rt_oif;
>> __be32 rt_gateway;
>> u32 rt_peer_genid;
>> unsigned long _peer;
>> struct fib_info *fi;
>> };
>>
>> which is about 208 bytes on sparc64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> Can be <= 192 actually
>
> rcu_head not needed anymore in dst_entry
>
> If we still want __refcnt being on cache line boundary, we might find a
> better way to accomplish this.
Once we can actually check something like this in, rt_dst is
guarenteed to be eliminated as well.
The dst neighbour pointer will also be gone.
So lots of shrinking still to go and yes we'll need to reposition
that __refcnt member carefully.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists