netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120709.141055.2204523729214009350.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	romieu@...zoreil.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hayeswang@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E

From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:12:15 +0200

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
>> Francois, what would you like me to do with these two patches?  I
>> haven't seen full ACKs from you yet.
> 
> You have two options:
> - You can apply the first (8106) patch. I tested it. I'm ok with Hayes point.
>   Consider it Acked.
> - You wait for a pull request with both patches + the incremental bits for
>   the second one. Some of the incremental bits are needed in the original
>   patch itself while some make more sense before the patch itself.
>   ETA: this evening or tomorrow morning at worst.
> 
> If you go for the first option, I'll simply skip the first patch and
> apply again. It's the same work for me.

I'll simply wait for your pull request, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html