netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120709101215.GA6530@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:12:15 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] r8169: support RTL8106E

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> :
> Francois, what would you like me to do with these two patches?  I
> haven't seen full ACKs from you yet.

You have two options:
- You can apply the first (8106) patch. I tested it. I'm ok with Hayes point.
  Consider it Acked.
- You wait for a pull request with both patches + the incremental bits for
  the second one. Some of the incremental bits are needed in the original
  patch itself while some make more sense before the patch itself.
  ETA: this evening or tomorrow morning at worst.

If you go for the first option, I'll simply skip the first patch and
apply again. It's the same work for me.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html