netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: optimize ipv6 addresses compares

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120710.224435.269512781698609358.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: optimize ipv6 addresses compares

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:44:21 +0200

> I dont see where in demux code we have a 64bit access ?

Oh I see, we only do it in the socket, sigh.

#define INET_MATCH(__sk, __net, __hash, __cookie, __saddr, __daddr, __ports, __dif)\
	(((__sk)->sk_hash == (__hash)) && net_eq(sock_net(__sk), (__net)) &&	\
	 ((*((__addrpair *)&(inet_sk(__sk)->inet_daddr))) == (__cookie))  &&	\
	 ((*((__portpair *)&(inet_sk(__sk)->inet_dport))) == (__ports))   &&	\
 ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html