lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:05:57 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: optimize ipv6 addresses compares

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 21:14 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

> Come to think of it, this should probably be bool to
> avoid anyone possibly using this in a sorting function.

Yes, this sounds reasonable, thanks.

[PATCH net-next v2]  ipv6: optimize ipv6 addresses compares

On 64 bit arches having efficient unaligned accesses (eg x86_64) we can
use long words to reduce number of instructions for free.

Joe Perches suggested to change ipv6_masked_addr_cmp() to return a bool
instead of 'int', to make sure ipv6_masked_addr_cmp() cannot be used
in a sorting function.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
 include/net/ipv6.h |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ipv6.h b/include/net/ipv6.h
index aecf884..d4261d4 100644
--- a/include/net/ipv6.h
+++ b/include/net/ipv6.h
@@ -298,14 +298,23 @@ static inline int ipv6_addr_cmp(const struct in6_addr *a1, const struct in6_addr
 	return memcmp(a1, a2, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
 }
 
-static inline int
+static inline bool
 ipv6_masked_addr_cmp(const struct in6_addr *a1, const struct in6_addr *m,
 		     const struct in6_addr *a2)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+	const unsigned long *ul1 = (const unsigned long *)a1;
+	const unsigned long *ulm = (const unsigned long *)m;
+	const unsigned long *ul2 = (const unsigned long *)a2;
+
+	return !!(((ul1[0] ^ ul2[0]) & ulm[0]) |
+		  ((ul1[1] ^ ul2[1]) & ulm[1]));
+#else
 	return !!(((a1->s6_addr32[0] ^ a2->s6_addr32[0]) & m->s6_addr32[0]) |
 		  ((a1->s6_addr32[1] ^ a2->s6_addr32[1]) & m->s6_addr32[1]) |
 		  ((a1->s6_addr32[2] ^ a2->s6_addr32[2]) & m->s6_addr32[2]) |
 		  ((a1->s6_addr32[3] ^ a2->s6_addr32[3]) & m->s6_addr32[3]));
+#endif
 }
 
 static inline void ipv6_addr_prefix(struct in6_addr *pfx, 
@@ -335,10 +344,17 @@ static inline void ipv6_addr_set(struct in6_addr *addr,
 static inline bool ipv6_addr_equal(const struct in6_addr *a1,
 				   const struct in6_addr *a2)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+	const unsigned long *ul1 = (const unsigned long *)a1;
+	const unsigned long *ul2 = (const unsigned long *)a2;
+
+	return ((ul1[0] ^ ul2[0]) | (ul1[1] ^ ul2[1])) == 0UL;
+#else
 	return ((a1->s6_addr32[0] ^ a2->s6_addr32[0]) |
 		(a1->s6_addr32[1] ^ a2->s6_addr32[1]) |
 		(a1->s6_addr32[2] ^ a2->s6_addr32[2]) |
 		(a1->s6_addr32[3] ^ a2->s6_addr32[3])) == 0;
+#endif
 }
 
 static inline bool __ipv6_prefix_equal(const __be32 *a1, const __be32 *a2,
@@ -391,8 +407,14 @@ bool ip6_frag_match(struct inet_frag_queue *q, void *a);
 
 static inline bool ipv6_addr_any(const struct in6_addr *a)
 {
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+	const unsigned long *ul = (const unsigned long *)a;
+
+	return (ul[0] | ul[1]) == 0UL;
+#else
 	return (a->s6_addr32[0] | a->s6_addr32[1] |
 		a->s6_addr32[2] | a->s6_addr32[3]) == 0;
+#endif
 }
 
 static inline bool ipv6_addr_loopback(const struct in6_addr *a)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists