[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120717.055005.1912765690890797652.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Cc: rick.jones2@...com, cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yevgenyp@...lanox.co.il,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, amirv@...lanox.com,
brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, leitao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
klebers@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4_en: map entire pages to increase throughput
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:42:04 +0100
> Would there be any mileage in permanently allocating IOMMU
> virtual address to the ring entries, then 'just' assigning
> the correct physical address during rx/tx setup?
There is a not a one to one mapping between these two entities,
in particular on the transmit side.
A transmit packet can have multiple segments, some of which are
larger than one IOMMU page.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists