netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Long term PMTU/redirect storage in ipv4.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120717.150920.1324071045620152376.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ja@....bg
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Long term PMTU/redirect storage in ipv4.

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:14:04 +0300 (EEST)

> 	Aha, I see. Something around fnhe_oldest() and its
> daddr arg does not look good. If the goal is to hijack
> some entry, probably for another daddr and comparing it with
> tcpm_new(), may be we should remove this daddr arg and fully
> reset all parameters such as fnhe_pmtu, fnhe_gw, fnhe_expires
> because the find_or_create_fnhe() callers modify only specific
> fields, we should not end up with wrong gateway inherited from
> another daddr, for example.

Better would be to use a seqlock when reading it's values.

Either way, patches welcome :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html