[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGK4HS8MvP6L5Rvy4wJx2KhdTSSHfP7YPT44e9mrV_vsBZJ9jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:10:06 -0700
From: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Kiran Kumar Kella <kkiran@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: implement RFC 5961 4.2
> But you probably are right, we could test th->syn here as well.
>
> Something like that ?
> - if (!th->rst)
> + if (!th->rst) {
> + if (th->syn)
> + goto syn_challenge;
> tcp_send_dupack(sk, skb);
> + }
> goto discard;
> }
>
> @@ -5327,6 +5330,7 @@ static bool tcp_validate_incoming(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> * RFC 5691 4.2 : Send a challenge ack
> */
> if (th->syn) {
> +syn_challenge:
> if (syn_inerr)
> TCP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS);
> NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPSYNCHALLENGE);
>
Yes. This is what I had in mind (along with a change to make
tcp_sequence() return bool). I am not sure if this patch is official
(or will be picked up by patchwork) but
for what its worth
Acked-by: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
I will send a separate patch to make tcp_sequence() return bool.
Thanks!
Vijay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists