[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342636962.2617.68.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:42:42 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
<ajackson@...arflare.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] sfc: Add channel specific receive_skb
handler and post_remove callback
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 11:32 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:20:00 +0100
>
> > + void (*receive_skb)(struct efx_channel *, struct sk_buff *);
>
> This looks to me like a conduit for proprietary features implemented
> in a binary-only blob.
>
> I understand how you're using here for PTP, but you're really openning
> the door for things I really wouldn't be very happy about.
Through all the functions that, er, aren't exported?
Even in the out-of-tree version of sfc there is no receive path hook any
more; I converted the client driver that wanted it (which is under GNU
GPL, thank you very much) to use netfilter.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists