netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Statically initialize init_net.dev_base

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120718.132010.1765790775051953381.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nhorman@...driver.com
Cc:	mark.d.rustad@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gaofeng@...fujitsu.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Statically initialize init_net.dev_base_head

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:11:49 -0400

> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Mark Rustad wrote:
>> This change eliminates an initialization-order hazard most
>> recently seen when netprio_cgroup is built into the kernel.
>> 
>> With thanks to Eric Dumazet for catching a bug.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
 ...
> I think dave was going to take John Fastabends patch from earlier today, but
> this works just as well.  Long term I'm going to look into delaying
> initzlization for cgroups, as it creates a strange initialization state when you
> have a module_init routine registered.

Neil, any particular preference between John's and Mark's version
of the fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html