[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120718202159.GA30706@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:21:59 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mark.d.rustad@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gaofeng@...fujitsu.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Statically initialize init_net.dev_base_head
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 01:20:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:11:49 -0400
>
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Mark Rustad wrote:
> >> This change eliminates an initialization-order hazard most
> >> recently seen when netprio_cgroup is built into the kernel.
> >>
> >> With thanks to Eric Dumazet for catching a bug.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
> ...
> > I think dave was going to take John Fastabends patch from earlier today, but
> > this works just as well. Long term I'm going to look into delaying
> > initzlization for cgroups, as it creates a strange initialization state when you
> > have a module_init routine registered.
>
> Neil, any particular preference between John's and Mark's version
> of the fix?
>
I think they're both perfectly good. If I had to choose I'd say Marks, just
because its done by initializing data, rather than adding more code to run every
time we create a cgroup.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists