lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342807280.2678.33.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:01:20 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
CC:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <roland@...nel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ali@...lanox.com>,
	<sean.hefty@...el.com>, <shlomop@...lanox.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: Add support for virtual machine device queues
 (VMDQ)

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 09:30 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 7/18/2012 11:42 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:05:44AM CEST, john.r.fastabend@...el.com wrote:
> >> This adds support to allow virtual net devices to be created. These
> >> devices can be managed independtly of the physical function but
> >> use the same physical link.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> +
> >> +size_t vmdq_getpriv_size(struct net *src_net, struct nlattr *tb[])
> >> +{
> >> +	struct net_device *lowerdev;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!tb[IFLA_LINK])
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +	lowerdev = __dev_get_by_index(src_net, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_LINK]));
> >> +	if (!lowerdev)
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >> +	return sizeof(netdev_priv(lowerdev));
> >> +}
> >
> > Why exactly do you need to have the priv of same size as lowerdev? I do
> > not see you use that anywhere...
> >
> 
> When we add a child device the hardware/sw may have some private data
> it needs to manage this device.
> 
> I made an assumption here that the priv space for child devices is the
> same as the lowerdev but this might be a bad assumption.

The code assumes that it is the size of a single pointer...

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ