[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500987B7.2030705@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:30:47 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: or.gerlitz@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, roland@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ali@...lanox.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
shlomop@...lanox.com, "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: Add support for virtual machine device queues
(VMDQ)
On 7/18/2012 11:42 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:05:44AM CEST, john.r.fastabend@...el.com wrote:
>> This adds support to allow virtual net devices to be created. These
>> devices can be managed independtly of the physical function but
>> use the same physical link.
[...]
>> +
>> +size_t vmdq_getpriv_size(struct net *src_net, struct nlattr *tb[])
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *lowerdev;
>> +
>> + if (!tb[IFLA_LINK])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + lowerdev = __dev_get_by_index(src_net, nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_LINK]));
>> + if (!lowerdev)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + return sizeof(netdev_priv(lowerdev));
>> +}
>
> Why exactly do you need to have the priv of same size as lowerdev? I do
> not see you use that anywhere...
>
When we add a child device the hardware/sw may have some private data
it needs to manage this device.
I made an assumption here that the priv space for child devices is the
same as the lowerdev but this might be a bad assumption.
.John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists