[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABF+-6XGO0Qvqd1O-aY28kG1jV=L6eRcupnZpaimTunddPwL2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:22:40 -0400
From: Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: add 64 bit stats
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com> wrote:
>> In fact all network drivers should use the _bh version.
>> Could you send a patch for all of them, based on net-next tree ?
>
> Sure, I can work on that. It should be a relatively easy thing to
> update. I can probably send a patch within the next couple days.
As I have been working on the patch I have been trying convince myself
that each case I change actually needs the _bh version of the
functions instead of blindly changing them. So far I have found the
following where the change seems to make sense:
drivers/net/dummy.c
drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
drivers/net/loopback.c
drivers/net/virtio_net.c
net/bridge/br_device.c
The only two other places in the networking code that use
u64_stats_fetch_begin/u64_stats_fetch_retry are:
net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
Do these need to be updated as well? Looking at these files quickly
and with my limited knowledge of the kernel I am not sure if they
update the stats in a BH context or not.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists