netdev - Re: [PATCH] b44: add 64 bit stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342847376.2626.8162.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:09:36 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44: add 64 bit stats

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 22:22 -0400, Kevin Groeneveld wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...il.com> wrote:
> >> In fact all network drivers should use the _bh version.
> >> Could you send a patch for all of them, based on net-next tree ?
> >
> > Sure, I can work on that.  It should be a relatively easy thing to
> > update.  I can probably send a patch within the next couple days.
> 
> As I have been working on the patch I have been trying convince myself
> that each case I change actually needs the _bh version of the
> functions instead of blindly changing them.  So far I have found the
> following where the change seems to make sense:
> 
> drivers/net/dummy.c
> drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
> drivers/net/loopback.c
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> net/bridge/br_device.c
> 

Thats right.

> The only two other places in the networking code that use
> u64_stats_fetch_begin/u64_stats_fetch_retry are:
> 
> net/l2tp/l2tp_netlink.c

This one is completely buggy, dont waste your time on it.

My plan for this one : dont try to have 64bit stats on 32bit arches, and
use plain "unsigned long" counters (if they are percpu), or
atomic_long_t (if they are shared by all cpus)

The writer sides might be run concurrently by several cpus, so
u64_stats_update_begin(&sstats->syncp); are racy : a reader can
be trapped forever.

> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> 

Same problem for this one, I think.

I CCed ipvs maintainers so that they can take a look.

> Do these need to be updated as well?  Looking at these files quickly
> and with my limited knowledge of the kernel I am not sure if they
> update the stats in a BH context or not.
> 
> 
> Kevin

Thanks !


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html