lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A71D24947E78D43BC584A7CD4391A41017DE4FB@SIXPRD0410MB359.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:36:03 +0000
From:	BALAKUMARAN KANNAN <balakumarank@...aelxsi.co.in>
To:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: flush cache according to 'preferred life time'

Than you Gao-san. Your patch is helpful. I will try that. Also I am facing another problem. Tahi test case section nd test case 145 is failing if gc_interval is 30. The test case is as follows
 * The tester node (tn) sends RA with curhoplimit 64
 * tn sends a ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nut is having hoplimit 64. (it is fine in my case)
 * Then the tn sends a RA with curhoplimit 0. (It should be ignored)
 * Then again tn sends ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nut whether the hoplimit remains 64 (but it changes to 255 if cache is present. But once I changed the gc_interval to 1, this testcase passes)
Can you please explain what is the reason. 

Thank you

--Regards,
K.Balakumaran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ