netdev - Re: flush cache according to 'preferred life time'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <500D1D07.3090103@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:44:39 +0800
From:	Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
To:	BALAKUMARAN KANNAN <balakumarank@...aelxsi.co.in>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: flush cache according to 'preferred life time'

于 2012年07月23日 16:36, BALAKUMARAN KANNAN 写道:
> Than you Gao-san. Your patch is helpful. I will try that. Also I am facing another problem. Tahi test case section nd test case 145 is failing if gc_interval is 30. The test case is as follows
>  * The tester node (tn) sends RA with curhoplimit 64
>  * tn sends a ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nut is having hoplimit 64. (it is fine in my case)
>  * Then the tn sends a RA with curhoplimit 0. (It should be ignored)
>  * Then again tn sends ICMP_REQUEST and checks the ICMP_REPLY from nut whether the hoplimit remains 64 (but it changes to 255 if cache is present. But once I changed the gc_interval to 1, this testcase passes)
> Can you please explain what is the reason. 
> 

Hi

Can you test with the last kernel?
Maybe this bug has been fixed too.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html