[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1344336431.28967.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:47:11 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: fib: fix incorrect call_rcu_bh()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
After IP route cache removal, I believe rcu_bh() has very little use and
we should remove this RCU variant, since it adds some cycles in fast
path.
Anyway, the call_rcu_bh() use in fib_true is obviously wrong, since
some users only assert rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
index f0cdb30..57bd978 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void __leaf_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
static inline void free_leaf(struct leaf *l)
{
- call_rcu_bh(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
+ call_rcu(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
}
static inline void free_leaf_info(struct leaf_info *leaf)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists