[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120807163454.GF2378@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:34:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fib: fix incorrect call_rcu_bh()
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> After IP route cache removal, I believe rcu_bh() has very little use and
> we should remove this RCU variant, since it adds some cycles in fast
> path.
Do you mean remove all uses of RCU-bh globally and also removing the
implementation itself? That would actually be a good thing, from my
perspective.
Or were you meaning something more localized?
Thanx, Paul
> Anyway, the call_rcu_bh() use in fib_true is obviously wrong, since
> some users only assert rcu_read_lock().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/fib_trie.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> index f0cdb30..57bd978 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void __leaf_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
>
> static inline void free_leaf(struct leaf *l)
> {
> - call_rcu_bh(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
> + call_rcu(&l->rcu, __leaf_free_rcu);
> }
>
> static inline void free_leaf_info(struct leaf_info *leaf)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists