[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120810083254.GB1543@minipsycho>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:32:54 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] netpoll: check netpoll tx status on the right
device
Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:52:36AM CEST, amwang@...hat.com wrote:
>On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 09:20 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >
>> >+static inline int team_dev_queue_xmit(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
>> >+ struct sk_buff *skb)
>> >+{
>> >+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(skb->queue_mapping) !=
>> >+ sizeof(qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping));
>> >+ skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, qdisc_skb_cb(skb)->slave_dev_queue_mapping);
>> >+
>> >+ skb->dev = port->dev;
>> >+ if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(team->dev))) {
>> >+ team_netpoll_send_skb(port, skb);
>> >+ return 0;
>> >+ }
>> >+ return dev_queue_xmit(skb);
>> >+}
>> >+
>>
>> Is there any particular reason for moving the whole function?
>
>In the changelog I mentioned:
>
>"For team_dev_queue_xmit() we have to move it down to avoid
>compile errors."
>
>Or you mean this isn't clear? As I changed 'port->dev' to 'team->dev',
>so the definition of 'struct team' has to be visual to
>team_dev_queue_xmit(), therefore I moved to down after that definition.
Right. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists