[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120814.145659.2264883418781808445.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fan.du@...driver.com
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFRM: remove redundant parameter "int dir" in struct
xfrm_mgr.acquire
From: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:23:09 +0800
>
>
> On 2012年08月13日 15:08, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:25:57PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>>>
>>> static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl
>>> *xt,
>>> - struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir)
>>> + struct xfrm_policy *xp)
>>> {
>>> struct net *net = xs_net(x);
>>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state
>>> *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *xt,
>>> if (skb == NULL)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> - if (build_acquire(skb, x, xt, xp, dir)< 0)
>>> + if (build_acquire(skb, x, xt, xp, XFRM_POLICY_OUT)< 0)
>>> BUG();
>>
>> xfrm_send_acquire() is the only caller of build_acquire().
>> So if you remove the dir parameter from xfrm_send_acquire(),
>> you can remove it from build_acquire() too.
>>
> Yep, looks like we can only remove "dir" at build_acquire, not into
> copy_to_user_policy anymore :)
>
> I will adopt your approach in v2 if Dave say *YES* about this patch.
> thanks anyway.
Looks find to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists