[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5028AB5D.9040200@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:23:09 +0800
From: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFRM: remove redundant parameter "int dir" in struct
xfrm_mgr.acquire
On 2012年08月13日 15:08, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:25:57PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>>
>> static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *xt,
>> - struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir)
>> + struct xfrm_policy *xp)
>> {
>> struct net *net = xs_net(x);
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>> @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_tmpl *xt,
>> if (skb == NULL)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - if (build_acquire(skb, x, xt, xp, dir)< 0)
>> + if (build_acquire(skb, x, xt, xp, XFRM_POLICY_OUT)< 0)
>> BUG();
>
> xfrm_send_acquire() is the only caller of build_acquire().
> So if you remove the dir parameter from xfrm_send_acquire(),
> you can remove it from build_acquire() too.
>
Yep, looks like we can only remove "dir" at build_acquire, not into
copy_to_user_policy anymore :)
I will adopt your approach in v2 if Dave say *YES* about this patch.
thanks anyway.
--
Love each day!
--fan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists