[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345572434.2659.60.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:07:14 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@...n.com>
CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Do I need to skb_put() Ethernet frames to a minimum of 60 bytes?
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 17:34 +0000, Arvid Brodin wrote:
> On 2012-08-14 22:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 18:53 +0000, Arvid Brodin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> If I create an sk_buff with a payload of less than 28 bytes (ethheader + data),
> >> and send it using the cadence/macb (Ethernet) driver, I get
> >>
> >> eth0: TX underrun, resetting buffers
> >>
> >> Now I know the minimum Ethernet frame size is 64 bytes (including the 4-byte
> >> FCS), but whose responsibility is it to pad the frame to this size if necessary?
> >> Mine or the driver's - i.e. should I just skb_put() to the minimum size or
> >> should I report the underrun as a driver bug?
> >
> > If the hardware doesn't pad frames automatically then it's the driver's
> > reponsibility to do so.
> >
>
> Nicolas, can you take a look at this? At the moment I'm using the following change
> in macb.c to avoid TX underruns on short packages:
>
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c 2012-05-04 19:14:41.927719667 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.c 2012-08-21 19:22:40.063739049 +0200
> @@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ static void macb_poll_controller(struct
> }
> #endif
>
> +#define MIN_ETHFRAME_LEN 60
<linux/etherdevice.h> already names this as ETH_ZLEN, by the way.
> static int macb_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
> @@ -635,6 +636,12 @@ static int macb_start_xmit(struct sk_buf
> printk("\n");
> #endif
>
> + if (skb->len < MIN_ETHFRAME_LEN) {
> + /* Pad skb to minium Ethernet frame size */
> + if (skb_tailroom(skb) >= MIN_ETHFRAME_LEN - skb->len)
> + memset(skb_put(skb, MIN_ETHFRAME_LEN - skb->len), 0,
> + MIN_ETHFRAME_LEN - skb->len);
> + }
> len = skb->len;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
>
>
> ... but as you can see this is limited to linear skbs which has been allocated with
> enough tailroom. Perhaps there are better ways to fix the problem?
skb_padto() should be all you need. Note that it frees the skb on
failure, so you must just return NETDEV_TX_OK then.
Ben.
> (Maybe the hardware
> is actually doing the padding already and the problem has to do with the way the DMA
> transfer is set up?)
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists